County-Wide Library System will be on the Ballot

May 5, 2009 by cachelibrarynow

The Logan City Council unanimously approved a measure that allows non-Logan residents to pay $100 for a Logan Library card valid May 31, 2009, to Nov. 30, 2010. The county will pay $30 of the card fee for applicants residing in the unincorporated areas.

The proposal states that at the end of this 18-month period, the county will put the question of a countywide library system on the ballot in the general election, to be voted on by all residents of Cache County.

In passing the measure, the Logan City Council stated again that it, “supports a countywide library system that provides all residents of Cache County equal access to all libraries within Cache County.”

This measure still needs to be voted on by the Cache County Council. County Council Chairman H. Craig Petersen said he expects his peers to add their support to the library proposal.

Logan Municipal Council postpones library vote

April 26, 2009 by cachelibrarynow

At the April 21, 2009 Logan City Council meeting, the council failed to reach agreement on the county’s proposal for library services for the unincorporated area of Cache County. The proposal is for a citizen to pay $75.00/year for a Logan Library card, and the county OR city will pay $30/year (see Library Vote Postponed).

The Logan Library Board has voted unanimously in favor of this, and even recommended that this same provision, should be implemented as a step towards a county system. The Cache County Council has also voted unanimously in favor of this proposal.

Logan Council members Herm Olsen and Jay Monson are in support of this proposal, and Steve Thompson and Laraine Swenson came out against it. Council member Tami Pyfer is undecided. A vote was not taken, but this proposal will be discussed again at the next meeting.

Council member Pyfer said she wants to hear from more people on this. She said she had only heard from one person, who was in favor. Anyone who is in favor of this should contact council member Pyfer. Her phone number is 753-7529, her email address is: tpyfer@loganutah.org.

This proposal if approved, can be the first big step in getting a county library system. If the city does not approve this it could be the end of a county-wide library for the foreseeable future.

Nibley County-Wide Library Public Hearing

January 12, 2009 by cachelibrarynow

Nibley will be holding a Public Hearing in consideration of a county-wide library system as requested by Cache County Council

The meeting will be held on Thursday, January 15 at 6pm.
The meeting location is 625 West 3200 South.
See: http://www.utah.gov/pmn/sitemap/notice/7727.html

The members of the Nibley City Council are:

Bryan Hansen (H) 245-2168 bryan.hansen@rrd.com
Shaun Dustin (H) 787-4430 sdustin@cc.usu.edu
Scott Larsen (H) 753-0954 swlarsen.nibley@gmail.com
Larry Jacobsen (H) 245-5960 ljacobsen.nibley@gmail.com
Thayne Mickelson (H) 713-0440 thayne.mickelson@ut.nacdnet.net

Providence County-Wide Library Public Hearing

January 11, 2009 by cachelibrarynow

At 6:30pm on Tuesday, January 13, the Providence City Council will hold a public hearing to receive comments on a countywide library system. During the meeting the council will take a vote on their position regarding a countywide library system.
See: http://www.providence-city.com/files/council-agenda-01-13-09.pdf

Quasi-Countywide Library System a Possible First Step?

January 11, 2009 by cachelibrarynow

By Jay Monson, Chair, Countywide Library System Committee and member of the Logan City Council, former member of the Cache County Council

The Logan City Council unanimously passed a resolution several months ago supporting the creation of a countywide library system. That decision was made upon findings of the jointly appointed City/County Library Study Committee. An additional study completed by an ‘outside consultant’ made almost identical recommendations of the City/County Committee.

Logan City remains supportive of the creation of a Cache County Library System.

Tina asked a question in her letter concerning why she could not borrow materials from the Logan Library since she shopped and paid taxes in Logan. All sales taxes go to the state of Utah, and they ‘divvy’ up those dollars and disperse them throughout the state. The community of Trenton and Smithfield do receive funds from this same state fund. In fact, most of the smaller communities in the valley could not provide the services they do without these sales tax dollars, of which Logan is the largest contributor, by far, in our valley.

In addition, Logan residents pay an additional tax levy to support the Logan Library.

One basis for Logan’s support of a countywide system is that Logan citizens would not pay an increased tax levy for a countywide system, but would actually pay slightly less per capita and per household than they pay now for the city library. Logan and North Logan are the only cities that have a dedicated and separate tax for libraries. The other cities with libraries take library money from their general city fund. Please note that the citizens of North Logan, Hyrum and Newton would also pay less for library services than they do at present for their own libraries. These four libraries, Logan, North Logan, Hyrum and Newton have three-fourths of material available in all libraries in the county (306,981 of a total of 429,169 items). The city of Smithfield indicated previously that they might join a countywide system. That would add another 30,000 items to a countywide collection. Mendon City also indicated previously that they were interested in joining. It also seems reasonable that the county/Bookmobile collection would be part of a countywide system, adding 26,150 additional items.

If the county were to orchestrate a countywide system with these cities of Logan, North Logan, Hyrum, Smithfield, Mendon and Newton, plus the unincorporated population of the county for whom the county has direct responsibility for, that would be approximately 72% of county citizens who would enjoy a countywide library system. The consultant and our local committee estimated it would be approximately $60 per year for the average home in the valley, or $5.00 per month for a countywide library system. When everyone helps pay for a library, the economics of providing services decreases significantly. This is the same model which our excellent public schools are financed; only library services cost much, much, less.

Certainly it would be unwise at this time to require the entire populace of Cache County to be levied with a significant tax increase for the establishment of a countywide system. However, the county could orchestrate a ‘quasi-countywide library system’ by bringing together those cities for whom a county system would not be a tax increase, and any other city such as Mendon and possibly Smithfield who want full library services, thus forming the beginning of a eventual fully-functioning total wide countywide library system. Until the economy improves significantly, many recommended aspects of countywide system would be put on hold.

The Logan City Council and Mayor hope that the Cache County Council and Administration will lead out in this endeavor. The beginnings of a system would certainly be a major step forward and far better than no system at all.

What Would County Residents Pay for a Library System?

December 3, 2008 by cachelibrarynow
Estimated Annual Cost (1st year) $3,184,652
Estimated Start-up Cost (one-time) $594,239
Total Estimated Cost (1st year) $3,778,891
Estimated 2008 Cache County Population 110,000
2008 Taxable Value of Real and Personal Property in Cache County $5,057,422,354

Cost Per Person

Annual Cost Only $28.95
Annual Cost Plus Start-up Cost $34.35

Countywide Library Property Tax Rate (1st Year)

1. Annual Cost Only 0.000630
2. Annual Cost Plus Start-up Cost 0.000747

Cost Per Family

Annual Cost Only

Home Value
$170,000 $58.88
$250,000 $86.58
$300,000 $103.90

Annual Cost Plus Start-up Cost

Home Value
$170,000 $69.86
$250,000 $102.74
$300,000 $123.29

NOTE:
1. Logan and North Logan residents already pay a library tax. That tax would be eliminated and replaced by the countywide tax.
2. Hyrum, Lewiston, Mendon, Newton, Providence, Richmond, River Heights, and Smithfield fund their libraries out of each city’s fund. Thus, those cities could reduce their budgets by the amount of their library expenditures.

Cache County Council County-Wide Library System Resolution

December 3, 2008 by cachelibrarynow

The Cache County Council, Cache County, Utah, in a regular meeting, lawful notice of which has been given, finds that:

WHEREAS, a joint Cache County/Logan City Committee has made a proposal which specifies procedures for establishing a Countywide Library System;

WHEREAS, the County has funded and received a comprehensive report indicating the costs of a Countywide Library System and also providing additional information about implementation.

WHEREAS, to establish a Countywide Library System, it would be necessary for cities that have libraries to enter into interlocal agreements with the County for transfer and control of those libraries;

WHEREAS, in establishing a Countywide Library System, residents of some cities would pay more for library service, while others would pay less;

WHEREAS, prior to making a decision regarding a Countywide Library System, the County desires additional input from mayors and city councils within the County;

THEREFORE, be it resolved that each city council in County be requested to (1) conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving citizen comments on a Countywide Library System, (2) take a non-binding vote indicating the council’s position regarding a Countywide Library System, and (3) indicate if the city council would like to have a representative on a committee charged with developing a transition plan for a Countywide Library System. The County Council requests that results of the vote and comments be provided to the County Executive by Feb. 15, 2009.

This resolution shall become effective on the date that it is executed.

Adopted by the Cache County Council on this 25th day of November, 2008.

County Library Fate in the Hands of the Cache County Council

November 15, 2008 by cachelibrarynow

On August 12, 2008, the Cache County Council hired a countywide library consultant for $10,000 to review the Library Committee’s recommendations. On November 12, 2008 the consultant presented his findings to the Cache County Council. The consultant’s report is well done and needs to be reviewed by the County Council and the county’s citizens.

The report asks these important questions:

  • Is it feasible for Cache County to provide public library services and if so, at what cost?
  • Looking to the future, can Cache County better succeed in meeting citizen expectations and demands for public library services than cities providing them independently?
  • The question of “Should we do it?” is posed not only to the Cache County Council, but also to the citizens of Cache County and of each city that currently supports a public library.
  • If a county-wide system is not established in the near future, will residents feel, a decade from now, that their public library needs are being as well met as they expect by nine (and perhaps more) independent public libraries, or will they wish that the hard work of building a countywide library system had started years earlier?
  • In terms of public library services, do citizens prefer to think of “the community” as within the boundaries of each city, or as reaching from one border of Cache County to the other?

Unfortunately, Councilman Craig Petersen has already declared the county library DOA before anyone else has had a chance to read the report. In doing so, Craig Petersen has wasted $10,000 of the County’s taxpayers money. Craig Petersen needs to be asked why he wasted months of people’s time and taxpayer money if he already had his mind made up. Once again we find the Cache County Council running away and hiding once they see the first sign that we as citizens are asking the county leadership to do something that is not easy.

“You [County Commissioners] are abdicating your responsibility … passing the buck”
- Carol Funk, Cache Library Board Member [HJ 9/22/1976]

Councilman Petersen says this is not the time. Amazingly, the county said the same thing 30 years ago. Looking back to when the county first rejected a countywide library in 1976, we know the answers to the questions posed in the report.

We have gathered almost 700 signatures on the petition. How many signatures does Craig Petersen need before he realizes that this is the time?

This proposal is destined to the same fate that each library study has faced in the last 30 years, unless the county leadership and the mayor of your city hears from you in a big way.

Here are the email addresses and phone numbers of the Cache County Council:

Please keep in mind that by taking action on this, it will not only have an impact on the entire community of Cache County, but may affect all 100,000+ residents of Cache County for generations to come.

We need only 300 more signatures on the petition to reach 1000! Please ask anyone you know to sign it.  For the latest information, see my blog at: http://cachelibrarynow.wordpress.com

Report on the Countywide Library

November 8, 2008 by cachelibrarynow

Pete Giacoma will be giving his report on the Countywide Library at the Countywide Library meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 11 at 5:30 P.M.  There will be copies of the summary at the meeting and the entire (106 page) report will be posted on the County Website.

A History of Attempts to Form a County-wide Library

July 12, 2008 by cachelibrarynow

Joesph Anderson, an Associate Librarian at the Logan Library, has compiled a history of past and present attempts to form a County-wide Library System in Cache County. The document can be downloaded here:

The Devil is in the Details